Like many other Gen-Zs, I grew up at a time when Nigeria’s traditional print newspapers were slowly losing ground to more convenient and accessible digital alternatives. These prints, which date back to the 1800s, were a major means for Nigeria to document, expose, debate, and educate the public on everything from politics and governance to socio-cultural matters, entertainment trends, and sports.

I vividly remember reading Complete Sports’ account of Cristiano Ronaldo’s heroics for Real Madrid in the 2017 UEFA Champions League quarter-final against Bayern Munich. I bought the paper for about N150 at the time, and it served the reading pleasure of my classmates before we handed it to our juniors who needed it for their Creative Arts papier-mâché projects.

The tactile experience and archival access were some of the key reasons newspapers remained popular, even as they shared the spotlight with broadcast media (radio and television) along the line.  However, while print has steadily declined, broadcast media has managed to stay relevant, largely due to its anchor on technological advancements.

It’s the same technological evolution that can be credited for the rise of a decentralised, read-on-the-go culture that digital media — through websites and social media — now thrive on. It was relatively easy for the population, particularly younger generations, to embrace this revolution.

The appeal isn’t hard to understand. You no longer have to visit a newsstand in the morning to stay informed, nor do you have to plan your day around broadcast schedules. With a mobile device and internet connection, articles, opinion pieces, and even research databases are a few clicks away. At least, that’s how it was before a new reality started setting in.

How often have you encountered this? You’re browsing on your phone, doing some light research on an issue nagging at you when suddenly, a pop-up message appears: “You’ve read 5 out of your 5 free articles. Subscribe $2 for one month or $20 for a year to continue reading.

“Already a subscriber? Log in to continue.” 

Forbes, The Atlantic, The Athletic, Bloomberg,  — virtually all major Western media outlets are now behind paywalls, with others warming up to the idea. The concept of paying for access isn’t really ingrained in Nigerian or African culture, but it’s undeniably slowly creeping into our ecosystem.

In Nigeria, prominent publications like Business Day and The Republic have already implemented paywalls, limiting free access to their in-depth reports and analyses. This shift, though driven by business needs, has been met with a little embrace from a demographic who wouldn’t mind moving on to the next available source in light of their more important financial obligations amid stringent economic realities. 

Another challenge is the illusion of options. While paywalled websites justify their fees with claims of high-quality content, piracy and content replication — which is a common phenomenon — weaken their stand. Convincing consumers that paywalled content is more valuable than what’s freely available on social media or bottom-tier blogs is a steep hill to climb. After all, why would anyone pay for something when they can get similar information elsewhere for free?

Even those willing to pay for premium content aren’t exactly in the clear. Imagine a scenario where you, as a sports enthusiast, subscribe to The Athletic and The Guardian to enjoy their wealth of thorough analysis, thought-provoking perspectives and exclusive news from the sports world.  In the real sense, your sports content digestion will be centred around these two sources — getting every bit of your money’s worth  — inadvertently also limiting your exposure to diverse perspectives. 

There’s a risk of being biasedly informed and educated as you binge content that reflects the priorities and editorial decisions of just two sources, potentially narrowing your understanding of events. It’s an ironic trade-off: in the quest for quality, we may inadvertently narrow our access to a broader spectrum of views.

This isn’t to say that news and other forms of digital content should be entirely free. Journalism and writing are already thankless jobs; we don’t have to make them more frustrating for those in practice. Paywalls are a necessary evil, even if going through with them risks alienating a significant portion of a media house’s readership.

Nonetheless, the bigger question remains: will the Nigerian audience eventually embrace paywalls on a large scale? 

For paywalls to truly succeed in Nigeria, there needs to be an improvement in both perception and structure. Media houses would need to make a stronger case for why their content is worth paying for—offering exclusive, high-quality, and trustworthy reporting that can’t be easily replicated by free platforms. They must provide a compelling reason why their paid content is not only different from but superior to what’s freely available.

In terms of structure, media outlets may need to consider flexible payment options or tiered pricing models that fit Nigeria’s economic realities. Intermittent paywall-free periods, micropayments for individual articles, or partnerships with companies to subsidise costs could make premium content more accessible. It’s about innovatively balancing accessibility with profitability.

The Republic, for instance, recently received $200,000 from Open Source Foundations (OSF) to support universities across West Africa by facilitating the shaping and reshaping of academic terrain through free access to their resources, teaching, result-oriented debates and opportunities for students to contribute essays to the publication. 

This partnership is a typical example of how media outlets can enhance their value proposition, aligning their content with a niche audience that values expertise and deeper insight.

The onus lies with other media outlets to follow suit — finding ways to make paid content not just a necessity for their survival, but a compelling offer for their audience.

Ultimately, the wide-scale adoption of paywalls in Nigerian media is inevitable. However, it remains to be seen what the impact will be for consumers in the long run.